![]() What makes it different from other browsers? LIBREWOLF ANDROID CODEThe intention is to continue using the Firefox code as a base to create a browser that clearly bets on the defense of user privacy. So, in 2021, the community decided to start its own alternative project to Waterfox. They were right, as some of their development decisions have already caused some controversy. Users disliked this decision because they understood that the motivations of the new owners would not be appropriate. In addition, it already owned an online advertising platform (based on pay-per-click). It should be recalled that shortly before it had also acquired the search engine Startpage. However, its creator, Alex Kontos, decided in 2020 to sell Waterfox to the British company System1. Then we have the Classic (which was constituted as a full-fledged fork to maintain compatibility with the old XPCOM and XUL add-ons). First, Current (the main one, which maintained that approach). Subsequently, In 2019, two editions of this browser were born. Its purpose was to improve performance and privacy management over the original. In 2015, a tuned version of Firefox, called Waterfox, began to be developed. However, we can tell you that LibreWolf is the browser that best protects your privacy. Where did this browser come from and what does it have to offer? This is something we will unpack today. On the other hand, that is not the case with Librewolf, a browser that only entered the tests last January. However, it is widely known among the most privacy-conscious users. Certainly, Brave is a browser outside the list of the big boys. Consequently, the results show a clear advantage in this field of two browsers over the rest: Brave and Librewolf. Actually, this test is for a set of 10 browsers: Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Brave, Opera, Librewolf, Tor Browser, Safari, Ungoogled and Vivaldi. ![]() Hoping to do a proper write-up soon to make it more approachable for others, once things cool down a bit at work.Hello! The website conducts monthly open-source browser privacy tests. More activity there, and self-hosting related discussion/issues/PRs in the fxa github repo, might push them to put in more effort to make it easier to self-host the stack and bring/keep docs up to date. If you take it on, there are helpful people in the #fxa: Matrix room. Happy I did it but unless you like doing this kind of stuff as a challenge, I'd probably recommend using some alternative extension, until it becomes more approachable. ![]() Once up and running it has been hands off, not much maintenance at all. ![]() The pieces are all there and it's all done in the open but it's clearly built with the mindset of a cloud-based startup. I managed to but it took a couple of days to dig through the sources and figure out exactly what is necessary and disable all the third-party integrations. It involves several interconnected microservices and a handful of separate mysql databases. To get the last meter and be fully self-reliant you need to go down quite the rabbit hole and set up the fxa stack. This means some metadata (not the synced data itself, mind you, but still) will be shared with Mozilla and a surprising number of third-parties. Most people just piggyback on Mozilla's servers for this. However, you still need a way to authenticate. Easy-peasy, you can set it up trivially in minutes if you're used to spin up docker containers and have a database server. LIBREWOLF ANDROID PLUSFor the syncserver itself, where all the data is synced and stored, you just need tokenserver+syncstorage, plus a database backend of choice. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |